Tow quick comparison: 2015 Ford F-150 Versus 2015 Chevrolet Colorado
Latest Truck sewa pick up Rodeo Texas Auto Writers Association has given the first opportunity to make a comparison with our new partner towing 2015 van. We carry a load with a 2015 Ford F-150 equipped with a new 2.7-liter EcoBoost V-6 and a brand new 2015 Chevrolet Colorado with a 3.6-liter V-6. We do not need to do instrumented testing, but we thought you might be interested in our observations will.
To his credit, TAWA allows its members to do some towing vehicle with several manufacturers that are part of the rodeo. We can not think of any other association of automotive writers who do this. This year there are four identical TAWA equipped with 500 gallon water tank – equipped with conventional brakes Surge hitch – to put behind any vehicle designated. Although we did not see the exact weight of the trailer, we calculate the total weight of water and strengthened support to be a bit more £ 5200 Based on the best estimate of the total weight of a double axle trailer is almost the same as the F-150 and maybe a few hundred pounds more than the Colorado. All the pegs and the trailer balanced and regulated, so there is no excessive tongue weight.
Ram for towing Ecodiesel this event is well equipped; The 1794 Toyota Tundra is a full edition of the load; Ford’s mid-level XLT FX4 package; Chevrolet and, oddly enough, has offered Silverado 2500 Heavy-Duty and Colorado Crew Cab Duramax V-6. As might be expected, large and small diesel engines (the Ram and Chevy Duramax Ecodiesel) made ??short work of the trailer stocky, with a Duramax significantly under-emphasized during the training loop. Similarly, the V-8 Tundra is no difficulty moving around loads comfortable and feel pretty stable (but we do not believe Toyota has not integrated trailer brake command).
The big news is to have a chance to pull the EcoBoost 2.7-liter all-new, high-tech, something we are not able to do with the recent introduction of the 2015 F-150. The point is that the engine seems strong enough to pull the load 5000 pounds whenever needed, but perhaps even more important is calm and set the chassis feels when pulling and carrying weight. Stopping the hill and take off on a pretty good record, handled smoothly and quickly settled enough irregularities in the way the truck. In comparison, Colorado, as it is a vehicle that is smaller and lighter with a naturally aspirated petrol engine, struggled a bit more. However, media platforms and engines have the power to grunt and pull to remove the burden on our route. We found more aware of weight and how the trailer can push us around if we are not careful when off the gas in and out of curves and angles.
Our drive route is quite short, but we managed to collect anecdotal figures. While driving the F-150 we averaged over 11 mpg, while the same trip in Colorado is a little less than 9 mpg. We’re pretty sure the F-150 is equipped with a 3:55: 1 gears, while Colorado only comes with a 3:42: 1 gear. There is no doubt Chevy will handle the load better with 3.73: 1 gears, such as the Ford – but it’s not necessary.
New EcoBoost F-150 will automatically turn off the auto stop-start and do a great job in Tow / Haul mode, which slows the truck sewa pick up jakarta and trailer with an aggressive program that allows quick downshifts when slowing or braking. Colorado, faced a maximum towing capacity is higher (about 61 percent for the F-150 and about 74 percent for Colorado) percentage seems to speed up a slow but very entertaining ability to downshift quickly with just a tap of the brake pedal or manual shift inch (Ford also has a braking function is quality, but it does not seem to respond quickly and tend to run the engine at higher speeds).
Based on this initial fast disks, both pickups seem able to do a lot of pulling hard, but Ford (with a smaller engine) seems to handle the load with a touch more confident. Chevy V-6 down 20 horses only when comparing the two machines, but when towing, torque numbers always tell a story. Ford EcoBoost produces 375 pounds-feet while the GM V-6 gets 269, a difference of nearly 40 percent. However, the player to be downsized, trailers of 5,000 or more is probably the 99th percentile of activities for trucks; even so, it’s good to know he will do with the controls.